從歷史背景來看,確實台灣有屬於⾃己困境,比如地域限制、主權未定論、沒有所謂的『台灣傳統文化』因為多元⽂化各⾃為政,我們沒有一脈相傳的或是曾經輝煌的『正統』歷史,即便以現在的政治環境是以漢文化為主,多族群的結構使得我們無法統一指稱哪一種⽂化才是主體。若以此觀點,不禁令人想起丹托所講得的藝術終結論,在『藝術終結』一書裡的主張,藝術史的終結,是因為藝術的限制僵局被打破,所有派別都成為可能性,多元主義的情況下,大家都是主體,也就失去主體。那麼,我們還有可能性嗎?無論藝術上、台灣問題,甚⾄是這個世界的共同問題。
From the historical background, it is true that Taiwan has its own predicaments, such as geographical restrictions, undecided sovereignty, and the lack of so-called "Taiwanese traditional culture." Because multiculturalism is governing each other, we do not have the same or a brilliant "orthodoxy". History, even if the current political environment is dominated by Han culture, the multi-ethnic structure makes it impossible for us to unify which culture is the main body. From this point of view, one can't help but think of the end-of-art conclusion of Danto. In the book “End of Art”, the end of art history is because the limit of the art’s limit is broken and all factions become a possibility. In the case of pluralism, everyone is the main body and loses the subject. So are we still possible? Regardless of artistic issues, Taiwan issues, or even the common problems of the world.
0 評論
發表回覆。 |
文章
全部
|